The WTO’s bid to pick an acting chief before September has been complicated by US “politicisation” of what should have been be a straightforward process, a diplomatic source lamented Thursday.
The World Trade Organization, already engulfed in multiple crises, could be left with no one at the helm if it fails to find a replacement before Director-General Roberto Azevedo steps down at the end of August.
In May, the Brazilian diplomat made the surprise announcement that he would end his second term 12 months early, and while there are now eight people vying to replace him, the process is expected to last until mid-November.
According to WTO guidelines, if such a situation arises, one of the organisation’s four deputy chiefs should be chosen to hold the reins until the next director-general can take over.
– Keep the trains running –
The position of acting DG is considered a purely administrative position, aimed basically at “making the trains run on time”, WTO spokesman Keith Rockwell told reporters last week.
The WTO’s General Council began discussing the issue last week, and most people expected a quick decision, but were caught by surprise when the US turned it into a “political issue’, a Geneva-based trade diplomat told AFP.
The current deputy director-generals come from the United States, China, Germany and Nigeria, and most members had anticipated that the German, Karl Brauner, who is in charge of WTO secretariate administration, was the best placed for the job.
“But not the Americans,” said the trade diplomat, who asked not to be named, adding that Washington is stubbornly insisting that the US envoy Alan Wolff get the job.
“Most people thought that this was an apolitical affair,” the diplomat said, stressing that “we only need someone to act as a caretaker for a limited period, to keep the ship on course.”
But once the US “politicised” the issue, “it became a political issue for others as well,” the diplomat said, adding that while no members opposed Wolff personally, China and a number of others were not prepared to give Washington its way.
The standoff comes as the WTO is already grappling with hopelessly stalled trade negotiations and surging trade tensions between the US and China, and as the world faces a devastating global economic downturn sparked by the COVID-19 pandemic.
At the same time, the appellate branch of the WTO’s Dispute Settlement Body, sometimes called the supreme court of world trade, stopped functioning in December after years of relentless US opposition.
Washington accuses the court of major overreach and has blocked appointments of new judges, leaving it without the quorum needed to hear cases.
– ‘A symptom’ –
To unblock the issue of finding an acting chief, the General Council chairman will reconvene members on Friday.
But with all sides digging in their heels, it appeared increasingly unlikely the needed consensus will be reached.
When asked Thursday what to expect, Rockwell would only say: “let’s wait and see what happens tomorrow.”
The trade diplomat meanwhile said that failing to agree on an interim leader would not spark a “practical crisis,” because the four deputy director-generals could simply carry on handling areas they are already in charge of.
Watch Leakblast TV channel from around the world
And the General Council could put any outstanding issues that needed urgent attention directly to the membership.
The problem, the diplomat said, is that “this is a symptom of conflicts within the membership that are surfacing and impacting even in the most routine and everyday issues.
“People are exasperated that such a straight-forward issue can be politicised in this way.”
Thanks for Reading via the most updated news portal
Get us on Whatsapp: +234(0)8181166425
Email Us: firstname.lastname@example.org
SUPPORT LEAKBLAST JOURNALISM OF INTEGRITY AND CREDIBILITY
Good journalism costs a lot of money.
For continued free access to the best investigative journalism in the country we ask you to consider making a modest support to this noble Endeavor.
By contributing to LeakBlast, you are helping to sustain a journalism of relevance and ensuring it remains free and available to all.